Here's how I put that other perspective (on April 8th): Reduction of consumption is an existential necessity (at least now and at least of the *rate*). One way or another.
People without homes and families will live frivolous lives. They have to, the human needs must at least be falsely met to stem off rage. The solution is homes in safe areas imo. You can't just demand they reduce consumption without addressing the reason they consume, to feed that empty feeling inside.
Charles I'm not trying to say anything but it seems like ever since Elon Musk banned you you're perspective has changed. Now wether that's a good or bad thing is a matter of opinion I guess... But I miss the Chuck that did 20 months of intel on JD Vance. But tomato tomatoe
Our mutual friend wanted me to camp his name, but I liked my name. Plus he only had two degrees of symbolism from what I saw when I had at least five. But they took us both out too eventually. Him for sharing Elon shitposts with some of the few people Elon looked up to. But I digress, Charles is actually right here. The question I'm asking is why. I have a good idea but I'm willing to wait and see, although I don't understand why he still says Chirsaeli.
Finally, first line of the first section and last line of the third. Lmao
JD Vance could be Trumps "assasination insurance" in the same way that Kamala was for Biden; Although, I do see JD being a very useful Manchurian Candidate for some foreign actors.
I like the part you didn't write about. Thanks.
Here's how I put that other perspective (on April 8th): Reduction of consumption is an existential necessity (at least now and at least of the *rate*). One way or another.
People without homes and families will live frivolous lives. They have to, the human needs must at least be falsely met to stem off rage. The solution is homes in safe areas imo. You can't just demand they reduce consumption without addressing the reason they consume, to feed that empty feeling inside.
Charles I'm not trying to say anything but it seems like ever since Elon Musk banned you you're perspective has changed. Now wether that's a good or bad thing is a matter of opinion I guess... But I miss the Chuck that did 20 months of intel on JD Vance. But tomato tomatoe
Our mutual friend wanted me to camp his name, but I liked my name. Plus he only had two degrees of symbolism from what I saw when I had at least five. But they took us both out too eventually. Him for sharing Elon shitposts with some of the few people Elon looked up to. But I digress, Charles is actually right here. The question I'm asking is why. I have a good idea but I'm willing to wait and see, although I don't understand why he still says Chirsaeli.
Finally, first line of the first section and last line of the third. Lmao
Thanks-if you have a good idea you're one up on me LOL I have thought that myself though-he's anti Netanyahu but Trump and Netanyahu are best friend
I'm willing to accept the offer of peace.
I like how you were finally a bit self disparaging, even if you hid it where not many could see.
Btw Insults don't really bother me bc they are either untrue or a learning exercise.
CLout is - of importance.
JD Vance could be Trumps "assasination insurance" in the same way that Kamala was for Biden; Although, I do see JD being a very useful Manchurian Candidate for some foreign actors.