New Records Prove It: Why Yes, Likud Was Involved in Killing JFK.
New Records Prove It: Why Yes, Likud Was Involved in Killing JFK.
Who was Reuben Efron really?
The selective release of classified material is among the more powerful information weapons available to a president or really, to any foreign leader. He who masters the archives bests his foes. Hit the books and win the fight before it has begun.
Back when Yair Lapid was Prime Minister I said he should have released all the material pointing at Bibi Netanyahu’s involvement with the September 11th terrorist attacks. Lapid didn’t—and so here we are. Netanyahu’s back in power and we’re pretending that the Second Occupation of Israel won’t have far reaching consequences when we all know that we are in the end game.
Anyway President Joseph Biden released some interesting material about a Mr. Reuben Efron recently.
Who was Mr. Reuben Efron? Let’s go to the New York Times Likud Times’s Peter Baker, who shamefully quotes JFK conspiracy theorists. Just what is going on over there.
“Efron was previously listed as being in the room when the Warren Commission interviewed Marina Oswald, his Russian-born widow, in February 1964 — the only one present whose title and role were not explained,” writes Baker.
Could it be that his mere presence was a threat to Oswald that she might be done in as her husband had been done in by pro-Israel Jewish mobster Jack Ruby?
Baker goes on at great detail about Efron.
Efron was born in Lithuania in 1911 as Ruvelis Effronas and arrived in the United States via Cuba in 1939, according to immigration papers that described him as a 5-foot-3, 135-pound “merchant-salesman.” In addition to English, he spoke Russian, Lithuanian, Hebrew, Yiddish and German, and served in the Air Force during World War II as an interpreter. His obituary said that after the war he was “a specialist on the Soviet Union and consultant on foreign affairs” without saying for whom.
In a harmonic convergence of conspiracy, Efron reported seeing a U.F.O. in 1955. He was traveling with Senator Richard Russell, Democrat of Georgia, and an Army colonel on a train trip through the Soviet Union when all three spotted what a C.I.A. report called two “flying saucers.” Skeptics later suggested they were Soviet aircraft. Russell was among the Warren Commission members in the room for the Marina Oswald interview that Efron attended in 1964.
As it happened, Efron died on Nov. 22, 1993 — the 30th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination. His wife has died too, and he had no known children. Efforts to reach other family members were unsuccessful.
That’s a spy family. Timing is everything.
Just why did President Biden disclose Reuben Efron’s name right when relations between America and Israel melted down? Whatever could it mean?
You can see the usual suspects out and about claiming that Efron’s CIA. But was he?
I find it extremely hard to believe. There’s a long, long history of Russian-speaking Jews monitoring Russian assets in the old Soviet Union.
At best Efron was a source for James Jesus Angleton and it’s easy to see why that might have been the case. Recall that Angleton’s role as CIA counterintelligence would have meant running sources. We also know that Angelton was extremely close to Mossad and was likely a mole for the Israelis though whether he was involved in the assassination of JFK or merely the coverup remains to be seen.
Could it have been that Efron didn’t just work for Angleton? That’s often the case with assets, after all.
There’s every reason to believe he worked for Israeli intelligence. We know this from Efron’s innumerable letters to the editor.
You can find him defending probable Russian asset (and definite Likud ally) Natan Sharansky.
We’ve been on that in our probe into the Israeli ties to Facebook.
You can see him lecturing about the relationship between Russian Jews and Israel. We’ve written about that a lot too.
He went on at great detail about Israel’s allies — the Maronite Christians.
You can even find him trying to argue that the U.S. should invest in counter UFO technology. (Please see generally my stuff talking about the role of Russian and Israeli intelligence in the UFO psyop.)
Think of James Jesus Angleton as a kind of Charles McGonigal avant la lettre. You can also think of Sirhan Sirhan as a psyopped mass shooter before our day.
Now that brings me to Mr. RFK Jr. who is perhaps one of the most interesting men in our current discourse.
Kennedy has, by his own admission, studied his father’s and uncle’s deaths in great detail and he has come to the conclusion that Sirhan Sirhan didn’t kill his father. I don’t know that I would vouch for every bit of this film but it is worth watching.
I might do something crazy like — I don’t know — running for President and exposing all the networks that had conspired to assassinate my father.
*****
As this went to press a few friends sent me more information.
A friend who has studied these things closely puts it out:
Efron likely was loyal to Israel considering he later living in Jerusalem part time. He also lived in Cuba before coming to America. He could very likely have had connections to the Jewish mob (which, in turn, was an appendage of Zionist terrorist groups).
I have to wonder if Efron didn’t alert his network to the fact that Oswald, who was loyal to the Soviet Union, was on his way back to the U.S. Efron would have been in the perfect position to execute a man-in-the-middle attack on Oswald since he was intercepting his mail. In other words, perhaps Efron or his Jewish mob friends spoofed some kind of order from Moscow to kill JFK. Oswald would’ve thought he was acting on the orders of the Kremlin but in reality he was tricked into doing it by Israeli agents who had infiltrated U.S. counterespionage.
It would explain the nervous behavior of the Soviets for sure. They knew Oswald was their agent (or at least he had made contact with them) but they would also have known that they never issued a kill order on JFK (and honestly, why would they? JFK and RFK were quite Soviet-friendly and were enacting the Civil Rights agenda in the US that the communists were lobbying for). So it looked bad for the Soviets, and they knew the US knew that Oswald was their guy. This probably spurred them to send the fake defector Nosenko to the US to help convince us that Oswald was just a small fish and not a real Soviet operative. I think the Soviets were scared of a possible reprisal from the US, knowing that the breadcrumb trail led to them.
There are lots of Israelis who have pretended to be Russians, like say the Russia collusion hoax which seems rather obviously to be a joint Russian-Israeli effort.
It’s nice to see the real Israelis out and about calling for Bibi to fall.
Hey guys no offense or anything but maybe stay away from historic New York landmarks okay?
We can document events too — and release the documentation.
Let’s hope Biden starts releasing some of that September 11th material too.
Who knew that the Biden presidency would be such a bonanza to historians?