How To Deal with a Foreign-Compromised Law Firm Backed By An Oligarch
Quite a number of you have written in to me to ask how you can help me. That’s kind of you. I really do appreciate it.
If you’re able to, I’d very much appreciate it if you could consider becoming a paid subscriber. If not, I’d appreciate it if you would share my content.
Here’s the situation: I’m being harassed in Texas by an ethically challenged lawyer backed by a foreign-compromised law firm. I think I got it handled but you never know. I’m thinking very seriously about suing DLA Piper directly when I return to D.C. at some point soon. You shouldn’t be allowed to use the legal process to harass people.
Unfortunately there is a lot of misinformation that’s being put online and that’s annoying so as there are some questions about my case I thought I would send this as it constitutes what I’ve actually told the federal judge in this case.
Judge Pittman,
I oppose Opposing Counsel’s motion and cite again that my appeal brief and stay are before the Fifth Circuit. I request not to have to attend court on Monday as it is overly burdensome. My mother was recently injured and I am in Boston caring for her.
There is simply nothing to be gained from me going to Fort Worth when I have filed before the 5th circuit both a stay and a brief. That process should be allowed to play out.
At a certain point we are going to have to have a discussion about harassment by opposing counsel and whether or not opposing counsel is acting as an unregistered FARA agent.
I also move that if we are going to be adding my Substack and X posts to the record that we should be adding this email I recently sent as well.
This case originated because Elon Musk and his associates are punishing me for being a code-named informant who reportedly accurately to the FBI that Musk was planning to retain Igor Kurganov, a poker player backed by the Chinese mob, to dole out his charity.
Lambert is an associate of Musk and Musk business partners at Giga Fund as we established at the trial.
Lambert is acting as a front of Musk. Musk has used numerous fronts in his lawfare. The discovery questions were focused on Musk to impede criminal investigations of Musk by the FBI.
Musk’s company Tesla remains a DLA Piper client and DLA Piper has recently written up a report about the use of resources for electric vehicles, most of which are processed in China.
In fact DLA Piper has attacked as Musk’s enforcer on other legal matters as well.
It is reasonable to assume that DLA Piper acts as an agent of foreign players. DLA Piper was accused of that most recently in a case involving the Chinese government seizing drones.
I objected to that overbroad discovery requests which led to this default judgment. It’s since come out that DLA Piper makes extensive use of AI — AI which comes from its Chinese partners.
When I looked at retaining Tor Ekeland as an attorney on this matter I was advised that Ekeland could not take the case because there was a conflict with Clearview.AI, which confirmed that Clearview and Lambert were working together to steal my assets. Clearview’s technology was developed in China and several of its top executives have been Chinese nationals.
It is reasonable to conclude that my data would not be secure, especially as Lambert and others are facing massive privacy violations.
My family retained DLA Piper to help us with a property manner. Lambert does not have the funds sufficient to pursue this case which is likely why DLA Piper has dropped the legal fees.
DLA Piper has had a number of Chinese-affiliated clients. Unlike other firms, DLA Piper has continued to employ Chinese workers.
" You shouldn’t be allowed to use the legal process to harass people." Michael Wolff is making this same point in his countersuit against Melania
New pod coming out soon?